What? Are you suggesting wearing masks killed the flu worldwide???
What about Sweden, FLORIDA and most African countries were masks were not used at all?
How about the same patients who tested positive for influenza and then for covid19, but negative for influenza, when Biofire testing machines were updated with covid-19 RT- PCR chip?
The parallels with religious belief are thought-provoking, and make me wonder whether other fields of intellectual or scientific activity would be as prone to accepting superstition, as medicine is? (And arguably, has historically been so vulnerable.)
Is it because medicine directly affects people's everyday life and reminds them of their mortality, that it is more prone to religious-like edicts?
For example, if Fauci or Biden or the WHO or SAGE asked people to accept that Pi=3.14 exactly, what would the reaction be?
Now, if they told them they had to accept that Pi=3.14 because that is essential to protecting them from disease, what would the reaction be?
Incidentally, there was an attempt to legislate the value of Pi and, somewhat worryingly, the person who tried to advance that attempt was a medical doctor (search for "Indiana Pi Bill 1897").
Another scientific field where this is the case: climate science. The more the media calls it the ‘climate crisis’ instead of ‘climate change’, the more traction they get. Fear of something largely out of one’s personal control seems to lead to people believing in whatever the ‘priests’ tell us.
I never questioned climate science once until all this covid nonsense. Now I’m getting more and more suspicious. I mean so far not one of their models have been true. They’ve been predicting the world ending in 10 years since the 70s but it hasn’t. The polar bear population and the barrier reef are doing great, contrary to the propaganda, and the more it’s called a ‘crisis’ by the media, the more suspicious I get. The more rich people tell us we need to eat bugs and stopping flying, before they hop back on their private jets, the more suspicious I get.
Then I read about climate gate, and the more suspicious I get. Then I find out that the big oil companies are the ones that started all the UN climate groups and the World Wildlife Fund, and the more suspicious I get.
I’m getting more and more suspicious too. BUT "In science, nothing is taken on faith. Everything must be proven." Can you prove any of your climate science claims? "Climategate" is an overblown+misrepresented molehill, as I recall.
But to your point on private jets: It is absurd that the tax on jet fuel is much lower than that on gasoline though.
Evidence please for :"They’ve been predicting the world ending in 10 years since the 70s. The big oil companies are the ones that started all the UN climate groups and the World Wildlife Fund."
As I see it, to the extent that the polar bear population and the coral reefs are doing well, as you say, conservation activities appear to be the main cause, e.g. the passage of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) in 1972, https://www.coraldigest.org/index.php/ReefRegulations
Tremendous essay! Thk U!
Which god made the influenzas "vanish" worldwide around April 2020 ,as per World Hoax Organization?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/12mJzo5Ny0TpE5efqdPSUir6sMgdHjLdU/view?usp=drivesdk
Don't tell me it was the scientific ignorance...
Answered here: https://covid19criticalcare.com/guide-for-this%20-website/masks-clearing-up-the-confusion/
What? Are you suggesting wearing masks killed the flu worldwide???
What about Sweden, FLORIDA and most African countries were masks were not used at all?
How about the same patients who tested positive for influenza and then for covid19, but negative for influenza, when Biofire testing machines were updated with covid-19 RT- PCR chip?
Another late Christmas miracle in April 2020???
I know that the US flu test positivity rate plummeted and stayed at historical lows, yes. I have the receipts (FluView screenshots) that prove it.
What about Sweden, FLORIDA and most African countries where masks were used less. (not at all is a lie.)
What facts in masks-clearing-up-the-confusion DO you accept?
The parallels with religious belief are thought-provoking, and make me wonder whether other fields of intellectual or scientific activity would be as prone to accepting superstition, as medicine is? (And arguably, has historically been so vulnerable.)
Is it because medicine directly affects people's everyday life and reminds them of their mortality, that it is more prone to religious-like edicts?
For example, if Fauci or Biden or the WHO or SAGE asked people to accept that Pi=3.14 exactly, what would the reaction be?
Now, if they told them they had to accept that Pi=3.14 because that is essential to protecting them from disease, what would the reaction be?
Incidentally, there was an attempt to legislate the value of Pi and, somewhat worryingly, the person who tried to advance that attempt was a medical doctor (search for "Indiana Pi Bill 1897").
Another scientific field where this is the case: climate science. The more the media calls it the ‘climate crisis’ instead of ‘climate change’, the more traction they get. Fear of something largely out of one’s personal control seems to lead to people believing in whatever the ‘priests’ tell us.
I never questioned climate science once until all this covid nonsense. Now I’m getting more and more suspicious. I mean so far not one of their models have been true. They’ve been predicting the world ending in 10 years since the 70s but it hasn’t. The polar bear population and the barrier reef are doing great, contrary to the propaganda, and the more it’s called a ‘crisis’ by the media, the more suspicious I get. The more rich people tell us we need to eat bugs and stopping flying, before they hop back on their private jets, the more suspicious I get.
Then I read about climate gate, and the more suspicious I get. Then I find out that the big oil companies are the ones that started all the UN climate groups and the World Wildlife Fund, and the more suspicious I get.
You get the picture.
I’m getting more and more suspicious too. BUT "In science, nothing is taken on faith. Everything must be proven." Can you prove any of your climate science claims? "Climategate" is an overblown+misrepresented molehill, as I recall.
But to your point on private jets: It is absurd that the tax on jet fuel is much lower than that on gasoline though.
Evidence please for :"They’ve been predicting the world ending in 10 years since the 70s. The big oil companies are the ones that started all the UN climate groups and the World Wildlife Fund."
As I see it, to the extent that the polar bear population and the coral reefs are doing well, as you say, conservation activities appear to be the main cause, e.g. the passage of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) in 1972, https://www.coraldigest.org/index.php/ReefRegulations